Comments for

Comment on DEFENDING CREDIT DAMAGE CLAIMS AND DEMANDS by Tom Xue

Tom Xue — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:38:06 +0000

excellent post.Never knew this, thanks for letting me know.

Comment on WHEN NOT TO MAKE A CLAIM FOR ECONOMIC DAMAGE by business

business — Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:37:45 +0000

Three late credit card payments can cause thousands of dollars of economic damage, and if there is a residential refinance or purchase costs increase, again thousands of dollars.

Comment on FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: by Divorce laws, divorce lawyers

Divorce laws, divorce lawyers — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 04:20:47 +0000

Divorce laws, divorce lawyers...

[...]CREDIT DAMAGE EXPERT | PRESS RELEASES | NEW ONLINE CREDIT DAMAGE SCORE...[...]...

Comment on CREDIT DAMAGE: THE INVISIBLE ECONOMIC INJURY by Sugel

Sugel — Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:10:23 +0000

The ability to borrow against the value of real property is also affected by credit reputation damage. Prior to injury, for example, an injured party could borrow up to 90 percent of the value of the property. After the injury occurred, the amount available was reduced to 70 percent of the value. The amount of money that could be borrowed was reduced. Additionally, when credit is damaged, the interest rate increases as well, so not only was the amount of credit available reduced, but also the cost of borrowing that amount increased, making it more expensive to borrow against the value of the real property. Credit capacity was decreased by the 20 percent plus the property owner experienced increased borrowing costs.

Comment on WHEN NOT TO MAKE A CLAIM FOR ECONOMIC DAMAGE by E. Keith Owens

E. Keith Owens — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:28:36 +0000

.Considering the evolution on the methods of measuring the credit worthiness of a borrower through credit reports and scores it is inevitable that the too much quantified system may slip in case of data mishandlings. .It is deemed that accredited financial bureaus are unable to process and house too much volume of data and still make it accurate. The failure to maintain accuracy in their reports and scores has posted new dilemmas on rightfulness of data and its acceptability. Due to such investigation results public pressure and consumer lobbying forced the government to passed laws such as the Fair credit reporting Act or FCRA to give off a leveled playing field for disputes and correcting of this information.

Comment on ECONOMIC DAMAGES ARE ACTUAL DAMAGES PART 1 by How much house can I afford

How much house can I afford — Mon, 18 Apr 2011 02:18:51 +0000

are you on linkedin?

Comment on ATTORNEYS by Fredrick Lose

Fredrick Lose — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:51:14 +0000

Credit is damaged because of non payoff for lease trade in.

Comment on JUDICIAL NOTICE LIST by kamal arnous

kamal arnous — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:49:07 +0000

my message is that the defendant damage my repudiation by excuse me of fraud so i need advice from you urgently .agreement was papered and signed 1981 to1991 cert en period 1991 to 2001 option but payment was made up to 1994 and he claim that the receipt was fraud .now in 94 the administer and i we agree on 20 year option and it was mention on the agreement both copy now he said all was fraud and he bust my door and take all my goods please advice what i should do i sue him by injectement and he bribe the court that the agreement is fraud but the administer send me a notarized certificate from the u s a that the payment is good and the agreement also is good so i am clear of his allegation .. i need to sue him again for damage of my reputation and creditability is lost

Comment on Contact by Marvin Schaffer

Marvin Schaffer — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 20:53:53 +0000

Frank: I would like to hear more..contact me by phone @ 818 667 6751 Cell
Marvin Schaffer
Associate of Georg Finder

Comment on Case Intake Forms by KEVIN ONEILL

KEVIN ONEILL — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:27:48 +0000

I have a suit against a rich Lady, her attorney and their large law firm for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and slander of title. She sued me to enforce a contract that she canceled( This is what the court ruled on the motion for summary judgement in the underlying law suit) The sale price of the home was approximately 2 million dollars. Because the suit tied up the house i could not sell it for two years. After that housing prices have dramatically dropped and I have still not been able to sell it. The law suit caused me to pay 100k in attorney fees, 300k in carrying cost on the unsold home, and approximately 350k in cash that I would have realized had I been able to sell the home when the market was relatively healthy back in 2007.

In 2007 prior to this suit my credit score was 751 now it is in the 400 range. I was able to make all my payments on time up until Sept 2009.
After this I was not able to continue to make the mortgage payments on two homes. One for 1.6 million and one for 180k. I was also not able to pay 180k in credit card debt that I racked up after this suit.

I am sure my ability to borrow commercial loans from banks has also been destroyed. I had previously had borrowed more than 4 million from one bank.
I also have been turned down by a number of banks due to my poor credit. I am currently working in car sales.
My prior employment prior to becoming a builder was in Mortgage lending. ( approx 14 years)
i currently have approximately 1.4 million in commercial real estate loans that I have been able to keep current.

i am represented by a very reputable firm that does a lot of construction type of litigation. They have taken my case on a contingency. At this time they are reluctant to hire a credit damage expert. ( I very much want one)
Could you please let me know what the cost of an expert might be and what the range of damages would be so that I could determine if this is something I might be willing to pay my self? ( or preferably to convince my legal counsel to pay for it)

This case will be heard ( if it gets to trial) in Johnson County Kansas court. This is in the Kansas City metro area.

Regards,

Kevin O'Neill
Estate Homes